Re: [f-cpu] Winograd DCT on my seul.org account

[Juergen Goeritz <goeritz@oekomm.de>]

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, cedric wrote:

>> What about CAML or derivatives ? :)
>And eiffel ? But, we need to support a lot of language and not only the one we 
>can optimize...

We have proceeded now to the point where to distinct the
optimizer from the language regarding f-cpu.

>> You are speaking only about imperative languages, which, I think, is not
>> very suitable in huge projects where we need to trust what we code.
>The question is where did we need a language for the F-CPU ? for hardware : 
>VHDL, OS : ASM+C, Virtual machine : ASM+C or VHDL,  F-CPU asm : C...
>
>So where did you see a need of a new language ? For special developpement 
>on F-CPU, perhaps ? In that case, it's not our choice, but the one of the 
>developpers !

We were talking a lot about parallel algorithms and the
lack of tools that can handle it in a good manner.

JG

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/