[f-cpu] Come back of loadcons

[cedric <cedric.bail@free.fr>]

Because no body continu the discussion about loadcons, I don't know if we take 
a decision. For memory, Yann say that the shifted loadcons cost a lot in the 
CDP and that's a reason to not implement it. For Michael "it only cost a mux" 
in the CDP that currently always exist.
	From Thomas point of view it's better because of scalability reason and I 
agree with him. If I resume all this different argument I can only go to the 
conclusion that we must implement this loadcons.

Cedric
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/