[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rep:[f-cpu] Erin32/64/128
- To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
- Subject: Rep:[f-cpu] Erin32/64/128
- From: "Nicolas Boulay" <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:15:08 GMT
- Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Delivery-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:15:20 -0400
- Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Send-By: 140.94.82.18 with Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt; FR 15/06/2000)
- Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
How do you handle function pointer and return adress in function ? Is it
no more data ?
nicO
-----Message d'origine-----
De: "richard hartny" <rhartny@bellsouth.net>
A: <f-cpu@seul.org>
Date: 19/08/02
Objet: [f-cpu] Erin32/64/128
Very interesting discussion. Fortunately I will never be faced with the
problems of the F-CPU architecture. Its more of the same stuff - permit
downloading of software and the problems will exist FOREVER. My
processors are bootloaded from Flash Eproms ONLY. No register worries -
I have only one - an Accumulator. And there is
no hardware path to the SRAM Program Memory from Data downloads.
Dick Hartney
______________________________________________________________________________
Pour mieux recevoir vos emails, utilisez un PC plus performant !
Découvrez la nouvelle gamme DELL en exclusivité sur i (france)
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/signhdell
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/