Re: [f-cpu] vsprintf result for GCC & FCPU

[Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>]

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:26:22AM +0100, Yann Guidon wrote:
> hi !
> 
> Christophe Avoinne wrote:
> 
> >So it seems that option -Os has more inpact on f-cpu than intel
> >architecture.
> >
> And there is still some margin :-P
> 
> >>I did added other optimizations meanwhile so it
> >>dropped to 5272 with -O and 4888 with -Os.

Too bad that we can't run the code and see whether it really works :(
At least, not today... but maybe by the end of the year. I have already
built a tiny disassembler (similar to ndisasm, but less powerful) and
an instruction-level emulator with built-in mini debugger that support
most of the currently defined instructions (but sometimes differ from
the documentation - I'll take care of that later, probably by submitting
changes to the manual :).

I'll have to do some `real' (that is, paid :) work this week, but maybe
I'll also find the time to modify/extend my assembler's backend to write
plain binary output files (the emulator doesn't grok ELF yet). In that
case, you may get a new toy for Xmas - or rather, a collection of toys ;)

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/