[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl

To: f-cpu@seul.org
Subject: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
From: Michael Riepe <michael@stud.uni-hannover.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:35:43 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:48:46 -0500
In-reply-to: <200212170838.353f@th00.opsion.fr>; from Nicolas Boulay on Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:38:53AM +0000
References: <200212170838.353f@th00.opsion.fr>
Reply-to: f-cpu@seul.org
Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:38:53AM +0000, Nicolas Boulay wrote:
> There some imm instruction using 8 or 16 bits.
> 
> I had proposed a long time ago, to use the 6 bits register adresse field
> to create an immediat adressing mode available for every instructions.

With the constant following in the next 32-bit word(s)? Well, no.
I don't want to build yet another CISC machine.

-- 
 Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
 "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
  - From: ben franchuk <bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca>
- Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
  - From: nico <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

References:
- Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
  - From: "Nicolas Boulay" <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>

Prev by Date: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
Next by Date: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
Previous by thread: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
Next by thread: Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] signed cmpl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread