[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[f-cpu] fcpusim picture
- To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Subject: [f-cpu] fcpusim picture
- From: jaap stolk <jwstolk@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Delivery-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:14:39 -0400
- Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
Hi,
if anybody looked at the c-simulator code,
and can't see how i have thrown it together,
this might be helpful:
http://f-cpu.seul.org/~f-cpu/new/fcpusim_23_july_2002.png
(uploaded last night)
it's very similar to the info in the files and YG's
paper. (and in theory it should be the same)
points of concern for now are:
-the combine of bypass_possible and register_needed
info on the x-bar (x-bar already needs all the time
we can get)
-checking the scoreboard and adding a new instruction
must be done in the same cycle. (or we have to find
some way to "bypass" the scoreboard)
jaap.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/