RE: (FC-Devel) Code?

["Arjan J. Molenaar" <A.J.Molenaar@xirion.nl>]

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Chris,
> 
> I like the project and have been following the discussions 
> between KUML &
> Argo/UML about merger.  The general thought process there is that they
> shouldn't merge.  
> 
> As far as FreeCase goes, KUML doesn't appear to work on 
> Windows, violating
> one of our charters.

Qt works on wondoze... Aren't they porting KDE or something (why should you use Qt otherwise ;-).
I have no problem with a non-Windows version at first. Porting can be done later (just rip out the nice KDE parts and it should work, shouldn't it? Nobody is developing at windows, right?

Arjan

> Dean
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	chris.m.moore@gecm.com [SMTP:chris.m.moore@gecm.com]
> > Sent:	Tuesday, February 29, 2000 12:01 PM
> > To:	freecase-devel@seul.org
> > Subject:	(FC-Devel) Code?
> > Sensitivity:	Confidential
> > 
> > I spy with my little eye
> > 
> > http://www.informatik.fh-hamburg.de/~kuml/
> > 
> > Haven't compiled it yet.  (It's for KDE and the QT 
> developement RPM on my
> > CD was
> > corrupt.)  Still looks alpha as yet but that may be a good 
> thing cos we
> > can
> > influence the direction.  Comments?
> > 
> > Chris Moore
> > 
> 
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No 
> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> If you receive this message in error, please immediately 
> delete it and all
> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it 
> and notify the
> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, 
> distribute, 
> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries 
> each reserve
> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its 
> networks.  Any
> views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
> sender, except
> where the message states otherwise and the sender is 
> authorised to state 
> them to be the views of any such entity.
> 
> 
>