RE: (FC-Devel) Code?

["Arjan J. Molenaar" <A.J.Molenaar@xirion.nl>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lavergne, Dean [mailto:dean.lavergne@csfb.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 3 maart 2000 15:46
> To: 'freecase-devel@seul.org'
> Subject: RE: (FC-Devel) Code?
> Sensitivity: Confidential
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	chris.m.moore@gecm.com [SMTP:chris.m.moore@gecm.com]
> > Sent:	Friday, March 03, 2000 5:00 AM
> > To:	freecase-devel@seul.org
> > Subject:	Re: (FC-Devel) Code?
> > Sensitivity:	Confidential
> > 
> > > "Lavergne, Dean" wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Yes, Qt does work on Windows.  The problem is that the 
> licensing is
> > > > different and not free on that platform.
> > > 
> > > Sounds good. Free (as in free beer) on a free (as in 
> freedom) platform.
> > > Sounds good for FreeCASE. 
> [Lavergne, Dean]  Chris Moore said:
> >  
> > We could port kUML to GTK.  GTK does run on both UNIX and Windows
> > (although I'm
> > not sure if the Windows version is stable yet).
> > 
> > It would mean getting our hands dirty and doing some coding 
> though. :-)
> > 
> [Lavergne, Dean]  
> 
> Actually, I have to admit that I have been doing some coding. 
>  To update
> everyone (and, of course, get feedback) here is what I have 
> been doing:
> 
> After going round and round on the repository problem, and 
> scouring and
> trying different packages, etc. I have begun doing this:
> 
> I am developing an ODMG93 compliant object database (easier 
> said than done).
> I plan to release this GPL under the name of FreeODB under 
> the FreeCASE
> banner (if there are no objectives).

Sounds good! Where can I find some resources about ODMG93? (haven't heard of it before I'm affraid).

I have to admit that I've done very little  (new job, exciting, exciting...). But now, since I have a computer at home at last... I'm ready for the big work.

> The plan is this:
> 
> Version 0.1.0 (I am trying to have this out by April 15th):
> 
> Single-user version with C++ bindings.
> 
> Version 0.2.0 (?)
> 
> XML support (and specifally XMI).
> 
> Version 0.3.0 (?)
> 
> Java bindings.
> 
> Version 0.5.0 (?)
> 
> Multi-user, CORBA-compliant.
> 
> I know that this is ambitious, but we have to make a stab at 

I don't blame you if you wont get te deadlines ;-)

> it.  Any takers
> on assistance, or suggestions ?

First a theoretical foundation... Then...

regards,

Arjan