[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: K6s

To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Subject: Re: K6s
From: Andrew Wood <ivarch@cus.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:55:14 +0000
Delivery-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 11:56:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20001116080046.009ffd20@pop1.nettaxi.com>; from dinos@bigfoot.com on Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 08:01:24AM +0200
References: <20001115210845.C3490F42C@agnes.fremen.dune> <5.0.0.25.2.20001116080046.009ffd20@pop1.nettaxi.com>
Reply-To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Sender: owner-independence-l@independence.seul.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.1i

Both of my machines at home have K6-2-450 processors.

- Andrew


>I am thinking about releaing K6-optimized versions of some important
>packages.  But who in this list is using K6 family processors.
>
>                         Jean Francois Martinez

References:
- K6s
  - From: jfm2@club-internet.fr
- Re: K6s
  - From: Dinos Kouroushaklis <dinos@bigfoot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: K6s
Prev by thread: Re: K6s
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread