[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: kexpress better than krn?

To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Subject: Re: kexpress better than krn?
From: Birger Langkjer <birger.langkjer@image.dk>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 15:41:21 +0200
Delivery-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 11:37:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.10.9910052119410.14676-100000@pegasus.rutgers.edu>
References: <Pine.SOL.4.10.9910052119410.14676-100000@pegasus.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Sender: owner-independence-l@independence.seul.org

Den ons, 06 okt 1999 skrev du:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Bud Beckman wrote:
> 
> > Since there have been a couple who have tried it, any compare it to krn?
> > 
> > Bud, wondering if I should add it to my rapidly filling up HD
> 
> Lacks scoring. Then again, I haven't tried Krn recently. Are the leaks in
> krn fixed yet ? Is it still a memory hog  ?  

It doesn't seem slow, it has some more features than kexpress, but it
doesn't seem to be a good offline reader, it only downloads and keeps
headers AFAIK.

-- 
Med venlig hilsen/Best regards
Birger Langkjer
http://members.xoom.com/langkjer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kexpress better than krn?
  - From: Donovan Rebbechi <elflord@pegasus.rutgers.edu>
- Re: kexpress better than krn?
  - From: Roberto Alsina <ralsina@unl.edu.ar>

References:
- Re: kexpress better than krn?
  - From: Donovan Rebbechi <elflord@pegasus.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: KRN site
Next by Date: Re: KRN site
Prev by thread: Re: kexpress better than krn?
Next by thread: Re: kexpress better than krn?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread