[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linking surprise...

To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: linking surprise...
From: Alan Chen <alan@digikata.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:57:30 -0700
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: mailing list linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Delivery-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:00:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20021023014240.GA544@homer>
Mail-Followup-To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
Mailing-List: contact linuxgames-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
References: <20021023014240.GA544@homer>
Reply-To: linuxgames@sunsite.dk
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:42:40AM +0200, Christian Henz wrote:
> So i added -lglut to my linker switches just to see how much that would 
> add to the size of the binary... surpsisingly the resulting filesize was 
> only a fraction of the original one! How can this be?  

If you're not statically linking glut, I'm not sure that you should
expect much of a size increase. Just curious, are you actually using
any glut functions (or including the glut header) in the code that
you're linking against?

-- 
Alan Chen
Digikata LLC
http://digikata.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linking surprise...
  - From: Christian Henz <chrhenz@gmx.de>

References:
- linking surprise...
  - From: Christian Henz <chrhenz@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: linking surprise...
Next by Date: Re: linking surprise...
Prev by thread: Re: linking surprise...
Next by thread: Re: linking surprise...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread