[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #12442 [Tor]: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not extra-info desc

#12442: Bridges should put their "transport" lines in their main descriptor, not
extra-info desc
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     Reporter:  arma     |      Owner:
         Type:           |     Status:  new
  enhancement            |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
     Priority:  normal   |    Version:
    Component:  Tor      |   Keywords:  tor-bridge, maybe-proposal,
   Resolution:           |  bridgedb-parsers 026-triaged-1 026-deferrable
Actual Points:           |  Parent ID:
       Points:           |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by isis):

 Replying to [comment:4 karsten]:
 > Replying to [comment:3 atagar]:
 > > Out of curiosity does this mean bridges will need to fetch server
 descriptors rather than microdescriptors?
 >
 > Bridges never fetched microdescriptors but always server descriptors.
 The bridge authority does not even generate microdescriptors for bridges.
 It's a relay-only thing.

 Right. They ''do'' have networkstatus documents, however.

 > Also noting down here that atagar and I agree that `@type bridge-server-
 descriptor` in sanitized bridge server descriptors should be
 [https://collector.torproject.org/formats.html#bridge-descriptors raised
 from 1.0 to 1.1] once these descriptors include sanitized transport lines.

 Agreed as well.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12442#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs