[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #7202 [Tor]: Implement ntor handshake or its successor
#7202: Implement ntor handshake or its successor
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner:
Type: project | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Keywords: SponsorZ tor-relay | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by mikeperry):
Thanks for the above. I'm reviewing the thread now. I just noticed this
from Ian:
> The directory authorities should probably checks the B's anyway, just to
be sane. They should all have order exactly p_1, so check that EXP(B,8)
is not O, and check that EXP(B,p_1) is O.
It seems everybody agreed this was a good idea, but I don't see these
checks in the ntor branch.
There was also some additional discussion about proof of possession of b,
but everyone seemed to agree that was overkill (though it did remind me of
#5968).
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7202#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs