[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #7028 [Tor]: Implement Adaptive Padding or some variant and measure overhead vs accuracy



#7028: Implement Adaptive Padding or some variant and measure overhead vs accuracy
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
 Reporter:  mikeperry                           |          Owner:                  
     Type:  project                             |         Status:  new             
 Priority:  normal                              |      Milestone:  Tor: unspecified
Component:  Tor                                 |        Version:                  
 Keywords:  SponsorZ research-needed tor-relay  |         Parent:  #7027           
   Points:                                      |   Actualpoints:                  
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Description changed by mikeperry:

Old description:

> As a defense against Website Traffic Fingerprinting, we should implement
> a tunable cover traffic defense that we could set from the consensus with
> a value dependent upon available Guard bandwidth relative to Exit
> capacity.
>
> My favorite from the research literature is
> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ShWa-Timing06.pdf, because it appears
> to be tunable in this fashion.
>
> The "BUFLO" variant proposed by this paper is better specified, but it's
> not clear it actually performs better for a given overhead quantity:
> http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~xcai/fp.pdf
>
> This is likely a research task. People who attempt it should also read
> http://ksubrick.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1.8982
>
> (Direct link, since citeseer is often down:
> http://www.raid-symposium.org/raid99/PAPERS/Axelsson.pdf)

New description:

 As a defense against Website Traffic Fingerprinting, we should implement a
 tunable cover traffic defense that we could set from the consensus with a
 value dependent upon available Guard bandwidth relative to Exit capacity.

 My favorite from the research literature is
 http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ShWa-Timing06.pdf, because it appears
 to be tunable in this fashion.

 The "BUFLO" variant proposed by this paper is better specified, but it's
 not clear it actually performs better for a given overhead quantity:
 http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~xcai/fp.pdf

 This is likely a research task. People who attempt it should also read
 http://ksubrick.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1.8982 (Direct
 link, since citeseer is often down:
 http://www.raid-symposium.org/raid99/PAPERS/Axelsson.pdf)

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7028#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs