[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #26620 [Community/Relays]: Tor Relay Guide: relays operators shouldn't expose their fine-grained monitoring graphs public



#26620: Tor Relay Guide: relays operators shouldn't expose their fine-grained
monitoring graphs public
------------------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  ggus              |          Owner:  Nusenu
     Type:  enhancement       |         Status:  closed
 Priority:  Medium            |      Milestone:
Component:  Community/Relays  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal            |     Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:                    |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                    |         Points:
 Reviewer:                    |        Sponsor:
------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by teor):

 Replying to [comment:18 cypherpunks]:
 > if weekly values should be rounded to the nearest 10TiB, should monthly
 values be rounded to the nearest 40 TiB?

 I said that monthly values should be rounded to 10 TB:
 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26620?replyto=18#comment:4

 Weekly values should also be rounded to 10 TB, because it's a shorter
 period, and shorter periods are more risky for client anonymity.

 (When we implement #22898, we will have a precise specification for the
 amount of noise that Tor adds. Then we can calculate the noise that he
 entire Tor network needs to add to keep bandwidth safe, and update the
 suggested rounding. I'm using 10 TB as a conservative estimate.)

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/26620#comment:20>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs