[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #30752 [Core Tor/Tor]: Practracker: usability improvements from May retrospective
#30752: Practracker: usability improvements from May retrospective
--------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner: (none)
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.4.2.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor: Sponsor31-can
--------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by catalyst):
Replying to [comment:1 teor]:
> Practracker failures are a bad and confusing experience for new
contributors (and researchers).
I agree.
>
> Maybe it should be off by default? Or warn unless you set an env var
that makes it fail?
I think maybe the stricter options should only run on cron builds? As
could the option that warns about exceptions that either could be lowered
or deleted.
I think we might still want to have a (small?) tolerance that practracker
will use when run from `make check`. But maybe we also want reviewers to
look at small regressions in practices that are within the tolerances but
that show up as warnings in the pull requests?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30752#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs