[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #3374 [Torouter]: Torouter OS and configuration
#3374: Torouter OS and configuration
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: runa | Owner: runa
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Torouter | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by ioerror):
Replying to [comment:39 runa]:
> Replying to [comment:35 ioerror]:
> > How do you propose that we open ports in a NAT device without tor-fw-
helper?
>
> Users will have to open ports in their NAT devices manually, which is
what they have done so far (and will have to do with the B3 as well). I
think it would be great to ship with tor-fw-helper, but I am worried that
0.2.3 is too unstable for non-tech users.
I think these concerns are unfounded and I see no technical reason to not
use 0.2.3.x and at least one major technical reason to do so.
What makes it unstable? I've never crashed a 0.2.3.x Tor relay or bridge.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3374#comment:40>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs