[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #16358 [Metrics Data Processor]: Do we keep the bridge networkstatus documents?

#16358: Do we keep the bridge networkstatus documents?
----------------------------------------+--------------------
     Reporter:  arma                    |      Owner:
         Type:  task                    |     Status:  closed
     Priority:  normal                  |  Milestone:
    Component:  Metrics Data Processor  |    Version:
   Resolution:  not a bug               |   Keywords:
Actual Points:                          |  Parent ID:
       Points:                          |
----------------------------------------+--------------------

Comment (by isis):

 Replying to [comment:2 arma]:
 > Oh ho! Yes, I just didn't look far enough inside. Thank you.
 >
 > Isis: it sounds like the lesson for you is that while we do keep the
 networkstatus documents, and each bridge descriptor one at a time, we
 don't keep the correlation between each networkstatus doc and *which*
 descriptors were being reported by Tonga at the time. So the next time you
 encounter an anomaly, your best bet is to grab the tarball from Tonga
 right then so we can investigate it later.

 Right! I've been kicking myself for that, and I think that has imprinted
 it enough on my brain that I'll be sure to immediately archive the tarball
 before investigating, for future times when I suspect anomalies.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16358#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs