[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #29710 [Core Tor/sbws]: sbws reports 6200 relays, 1000 fewer than Torflow's 7200
#29710: sbws reports 6200 relays, 1000 fewer than Torflow's 7200
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: starlight | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: needs_information
Priority: Medium | Milestone: sbws: unspecified
Component: Core Tor/sbws | Version: sbws: unspecified
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by teor):
Hi, the answer to this question is:
sbws only reports bandwidths for Running relays, but torflow reports
bandwidths for all relays it has recently measured.
Here is the evidence:
longclaw's bandwidth file says:
{{{
1559468088
number_consensus_relays=6552
number_eligible_relays=6328
percent_eligible_relays=97
}}}
http://199.58.81.140/tor/status-vote/next/bandwidth
moria1's bandwidth file says:
{{{
$ curl http://128.31.0.34:9131/tor/status-vote/next/bandwidth | wc -l
8955
}}}
consensus health says:
{{{
faravahar 7490 total 6576 Running
consensus 6603 Running
}}}
https://consensus-health.torproject.org/#numberofrelays
Our next step is to fix the 90% failure rate in #30719. That might improve
longclaw's measurement rate above 97%.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/29710#comment:13>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs