[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #21272 [Metrics]: Onionperf deployment



#21272: Onionperf deployment
-------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  hiro         |          Owner:  metrics-team
     Type:  enhancement  |         Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium       |      Milestone:
Component:  Metrics      |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:               |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:               |         Points:
 Reviewer:               |        Sponsor:
-------------------------+------------------------------

Comment (by karsten):

 Replying to [comment:19 iwakeh]:
 > Only two short questions about naming scheme and host url:
 >
 > Currently the beginning of the host url is reflected in the file name.
 > Why can't we just use the beginning of the host url, i.e., the op-$cc
 part
 > for checking the filenames?

 Sure, we could do that.  And we could extend that if we need to.  Works
 for me.

 > Is the goal now to just download all available measurements regarding
 file size?

 Hmm, I guess the main reason for specifying file sizes explicitly in
 `TorperfFilesLines` was that we didn't parse a directory listing, so we
 had to know which file sizes exist.  But here we do know which file sizes
 are measured, so the only reason for specifying those would be to exclude
 sizes we don't recognize.  Do we have to do that?  I'd say as long as the
 file sizes stated in the .tpf file name matches the `FILESIZE` value
 contained in that file, we'll take what we get.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21272#comment:20>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs