[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #1938 [Tor Bridge]: UpdateBridgesFromAuthority dangerous



#1938: UpdateBridgesFromAuthority dangerous
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma        |          Owner:                    
     Type:  task        |         Status:  needs_review      
 Priority:  major       |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component:  Tor Bridge  |        Version:                    
 Keywords:              |         Parent:                    
   Points:              |   Actualpoints:                    
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by ln5):

 Replying to [comment:10 nickm]:
 > There's a patch in my branch "bug1938" that does that, but I believe it
 isn't complete.  Looking at the logic in fetch_bridge_descriptors(), it
 seems like the requisite fallback logic doesn't exist.  In other words,
 what we'd actually want is something like, "Try the bridge first and use
 the authority if it isn't there", or "Try the authority first and use the
 bridge if it can't answer."  But from the way we set ask_bridge_directly,
 it seems like we always use it when we can and when
 UpdateBridgesFromAuthority is on.
 >
 > I think what we want is a setting that makes us use
 ask_bridge_directly=1 unless we've tried to connect to the bridge and
 failed.

 Should the user be able to choose between "first bridge, then
 authority" and "first auth, then bridge"?  Is that what the part about
 "a setting" means?  It seems to me that the second option would be
 exactly what Roger thinks is a bad idea ("first go to the centralized
 place that is easily associated with being a Tor bridge user, then if
 it's unreachable go directly to the bridge for its descriptor").
 Presumably because it'd enable a censor to easily block the bridge
 authority and then look for users trying to connect to it and harvest
 bridges by looking for TCP connections from that user.

 In the first case, where we prefer fetching from the bridge, should we
 try _all_ bridges before going to the authority?

 In the second case, where we prefer asking the authority first, should
 we ask for _all_ bridges before we fall back to trying to contact the
 bridges themselves?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1938#comment:11>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs