[tor-bugs] #22351 [Core Tor/Tor]: Should bridge lines in the state file use unlisted_since?

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#22351: Should bridge lines in the state file use unlisted_since?
------------------------------+--------------------------------
     Reporter:  arma          |      Owner:
         Type:  defect        |     Status:  new
     Priority:  Medium        |  Milestone:
    Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |    Version:  Tor: 0.3.1.1-alpha
     Severity:  Normal        |   Keywords:
Actual Points:                |  Parent ID:
       Points:                |   Reviewer:
      Sponsor:                |
------------------------------+--------------------------------
 I have a bridge in my recent Tor (post prop#271), and my state file now
 says:
 {{{
 Guard in=bridges rsa_id=C7BE8154678E7537CCAC60B097D51A8A7EF8BCDF
 bridge_addr=94.242.249.2:94 sampled_on=2017-05-04T10:39:09
 sampled_by=0.3.1.0-alpha-dev unlisted_since=2017-05-11T05:47:41 listed=0
 confirmed_on=2017-05-02T01:15:03 confirmed_idx=0 pb_use_attempts=1.000000
 pb_use_successes=1.000000 pb_circ_attempts=11.000000
 pb_circ_successes=11.000000 pb_successful_circuits_closed=11.000000
 }}}

 The unlisted_since and listed=0 are not surprising, since bridges will
 never be listed, right? Does that make my Tor do anything I shouldn't want
 it to do, like throw out the bridge line sooner than I'd want? I think no,
 because hey if it's in torrc it'll go back in, but maybe throwing out the
 path bias info early was not what we expect?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22351>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs