Re: [tor-bugs] #4486 [Analysis]: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <torproject-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#4486: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:  robgjansen       
     Type:  task                     |         Status:  needs_information
 Priority:  normal                   |      Milestone:                   
Component:  Analysis                 |        Version:                   
 Keywords:  performance flowcontrol  |         Parent:  #4506            
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:                   
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by robgjansen):

 Replying to [comment:29 karsten]:


 > Replying to [comment:28 karsten]:
 >
 > > Replying to [comment:27 arma]:
 > >
 > > > Karsten, if you're looking for more sims to run, this is a good one.
 You can run it with default config as a baseline (UseN23 defaults to 0).
 > > >
 > >
 > > I just started this simulation with the default value for UseN23.
 > >
 >
 > I'm running into a problem, but it seems that master is to blame here,
 not the n23-4 branch.  There's something wrong with bootstrapping.

 If you're using Tor 0.2.4.x, you'll need the following Shadow fix, which
 didn't make it into the default release 1.6.0 that's part of the current
 EC2 image:
 https://github.com/shadow/shadow/commit/1719e7e287743767f7d10895f15683a8f90bb865

 The easiest way to get that is to just use Shadow master.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4486#comment:30>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs