[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #4486 [Analysis]: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?



#4486: Research: should N23 actually help in practice?
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                     |          Owner:  robgjansen       
     Type:  task                     |         Status:  needs_information
 Priority:  normal                   |      Milestone:                   
Component:  Analysis                 |        Version:                   
 Keywords:  performance flowcontrol  |         Parent:  #4506            
   Points:                           |   Actualpoints:                   
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by robgjansen):

 I just uploaded a
 [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/4486/20121025-apollo-n23-combined.pdf
 new set of graphs], created using arma's n23-2 branch (after fixing the
 missing bracket). These were done with the large-m2.4xlarge distributed
 with Shadow.

 The graphs generally show improvement for small files only when using
 'N3Initial 50' as evident in all of the time-to-first-byte graphs.
 However, N23 seem to make things worse as more is downloaded through the
 circuit. The only time-to-last-byte improvement is for the 50KiB perf
 clients (who use a new circuit for every download), and again, only when
 using 'N3Initial 50'.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4486#comment:37>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs