[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #32026 [Circumvention/Censorship analysis]: Using An Alternative To TCP To Avoid Packet Injection?

#32026: Using An Alternative To TCP To Avoid Packet Injection?
-----------------------------------------------+------------------------
 Reporter:  Aphrodites1995                     |          Owner:  (none)
     Type:  enhancement                        |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Medium                             |      Milestone:
Component:  Circumvention/Censorship analysis  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                             |     Resolution:
 Keywords:                                     |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                                     |         Points:
 Reviewer:                                     |        Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------------+------------------------

Comment (by Aphrodites1995):

 If obfs4 is resistant, why doesn't it work in china? Is it because of the
 middle node problem? So then why can't we just have one proxy as a node,
 and not do the onion thing, or at least make that an option? (I know TOR
 stands for The Onion Router, but it would be okay to betray the name for
 the sake of anti censorship, right?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32026#comment:5>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs