[or-cvs] r10971: Answer comment from Roger. (in tor/trunk: . src/or)

[nickm@xxxxxxxx]

Author: nickm
Date: 2007-07-29 09:18:52 -0400 (Sun, 29 Jul 2007)
New Revision: 10971

Modified:
   tor/trunk/
   tor/trunk/src/or/dirserv.c
Log:
 r13986@catbus:  nickm | 2007-07-29 09:15:03 -0400
 Answer comment from Roger.



Property changes on: tor/trunk
___________________________________________________________________
 svk:merge ticket from /tor/trunk [r13986] on 8246c3cf-6607-4228-993b-4d95d33730f1

Modified: tor/trunk/src/or/dirserv.c
===================================================================
--- tor/trunk/src/or/dirserv.c	2007-07-29 05:56:30 UTC (rev 10970)
+++ tor/trunk/src/or/dirserv.c	2007-07-29 13:18:52 UTC (rev 10971)
@@ -1739,6 +1739,9 @@
 
   /* XXX020 k n lg n memcmps could show up bigtime in profiling. If
    * they do, I suggest we just give authorities a free pass. -RD */
+  /* I think we're fine.  Remember, in nearly all cases, the addresses
+   * will be different and we'll never actually reach this point. -NM */
+
   first_is_auth =
     router_digest_is_trusted_dir(first->cache_info.identity_digest);
   second_is_auth =