[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay
From: Felix <zwiebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:40:59 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 02:39:03 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1569134325; bh=SsL6Mi4AAATPRYGq3ZUecIrXXGACbUq0yUNMS+jOM/w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=cl+e8afKL5x+3bwYA5tOgxRQPLP8A7uJLdbVj+O3ATcB59iQMpY3Q55/vbN70PZE3 3ZHuGRSiZ3Nw7Ju/tlic6a19iGlDLKA2jvMoWSYV/TQUuzTJ2qXKBZhj7RPWAnfphM njy0N8UTddLgI/DSTKZha/cVYKoL7pFubHCVzCPw=
In-reply-to: <0557b502-d3f4-f689-afbe-42e5b143f6c9@gmx.de>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <09ADB7D6-3243-43EE-8A50-1EE992C2317A@nrl.navy.mil> <4e85e266-8c88-0079-d72d-3ac486c9b33f@gmx.de> <71E9270C-4FF2-4F27-9B9E-E31B449E6E6A@riseup.net> <81293b63-7027-d004-f3fc-91945a77b117@gmx.de> <5D62996E.704@quantentunnel.de> <18B9A10C-9254-40CA-AF12-56577A87E0D6@riseup.net> <9bbb895a-4563-dfef-1e6a-8381029d9b64@gmx.de> <0ED78766-9597-4E65-9819-7057377E92D9@riseup.net> <75b34c6e-f65b-e2bc-e9ca-fb76a7dddd61@gmx.de> <5D7FE057.9020905@quantentunnel.de> <0557b502-d3f4-f689-afbe-42e5b143f6c9@gmx.de>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0


Am 2019-09-21 um 4:11 PM schrieb Toralf Förster:

On 9/16/19 9:19 PM, Felix wrote:


The sbws bandwidth authorities now can measure the bandwidth of the relay.

Can somebody confirm my observation or has prove (please no speculations).


I upgraded LibreSSL from 2.9.2 to 3.0.0 here at a stable Gentoo Linux
and got immediately from all IPv6 capable BW authorties the
"ReachableIPv6" flag back at both affected relays.


I have different ssl library setups on the same server (Freebsd):

sbws measurement is working now for Openssl102s/t, Openssl111d and
Libressl 300.

sbws measurement is _not_ working now for Libressl 292.

--
Cheers, Felix
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay
  - From: teor

References:
- Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay (was: Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths)
  - From: Felix
- Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay (was: Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths)
  - From: Toralf Förster

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Status of "new" defect #30767 Custom obfs4 bridge does not work on Tor Browser for Android
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay (was: Measuring the Accuracy of Tor Relays' Advertised Bandwidths)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] possible interference between sbws and a libressl relay
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread