woah! there is such a thing as a .onion address? sick. this is like
an even better mixminion.
let me know when i can start using your server dude. by the way, what's
your home address and the ip address of your server?
clay
"Extending the war into Iraq would have incurred incalculable human and political
costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The
coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting in anger and other
allies pulling out as well. Exceeding the U.N.'s mandate would have destroyed the
precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we
gone the invasion route, the U.S. could still be an occupying power in a bitterly
hostile land."
-- From "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam"
by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time Magazine, 1998
----- Original message -----
From: "tor" <tor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "CLAY SHENTRUP" <CLAY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:56:24 -0700
Subject: Re: [OTR-users] Jabberd, AdiumX and TOR(reason for the
crossposting..)
Hi Clay,
via the .onion address of course
this part in #2 for c2s I have done and have going online at least to a
.onion address for the jabber server :)
next I need to get jabberd2/resolver and jabberd2/s2s working via tor
resolution and transport.
BTW I was never able to get file transport working under tor(I suspect
dcc just will never work with .onion addresses)
a tor operator
ps this is much more of a TOR post than an OTR related one now..
and again this part I have succeeded with I have the c2s portion of
jabber operating with TLS and SASL via
TOR.. its linkup to other .onion based jabber server I am currently
working on.
CLAY SHENTRUP wrote:
I've used tor with otr in gaim for several months now. I'm not sure I
see the significance here.
Are you saying you're going to torify your server? If that's the case,
how the heck does one find your server? This sounds cool though.
Clay
"Extending the war into Iraq would have incurred incalculable human and political
costs. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The
coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting in anger and other
allies pulling out as well. Exceeding the U.N.'s mandate would have destroyed the
precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we
gone the invasion route, the U.S. could still be an occupying power in a bitterly
hostile land."
-- From "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam"
by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time Magazine, 1998