[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: xB Mail: Anonymous Email Client
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: xB Mail: Anonymous Email Client
- From: Arrakis <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:28:05 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:28:23 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SKXUXh9kjh+LV6ZGQoV0ozsqAg3sESXBKcPi5GH2XgM=; b=kMpDd5W3SeMMt/Hfy+GQM4/HuDvp65jz3S77uxpNT4H6nNM/6x5UIUfaJpUZtQeDcw KmKgTS0YGIV90BA0RDKMVJszKEeIrVGTDfPxZ4aBJtmyurM3TO4cAx2OsfSeJyX+2d6O BXPQcigr0Y1CUYdoXr3qsgzRS2xRd8Uq1bbJU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rNL6moq5/pX8r1e65etWNcqmCaQ/iJddo+sV5wK0FkrkEnx+Q+zT/DhkdquD0OkVFL hj+EV9ALqjPH1KDq08gcL+sMzHOeO4U2CbQ7ewZPOV9shRyvn0C1qFK2owpGSHBGy10O 8ctOpcQ+Ei9iqLu+7jAxQzdwYUaqLHZ8C+zO4=
- In-reply-to: <20080820215428.GA29306@sescenties>
- References: <48AC8038.8050907@xxxxxxxxx> <20080820215428.GA29306@sescenties>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
> (I don't think it's necessary to repeat that thread.)
Then I'm unsure why you thought it appropriate to repeat it now.
If FOSS is your jesus, that's fine. If you don't mind spyware
makers and for-profit codejackers being the only ones getting
a boot in the face, that's fine too. The point being, it is
not your prerogative to choose my software religion, or that
of others.
And if it was merely your noble intention to bring relevant
subject data to light, rather than embarrassing the EFF by
making a comment antithetical to their existence and attempting
to derail a thread, then we should seriously consider uploading
your consciousness to the google collective.
Kind Regards,
Arrakis
P.S. Privacy enhancing technologies are a young science. Who
knows, some people might appreciate such a license...
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/6779
http://blogs.stopbadware.org/articles/2007/09/07/fake-tor-application-delivers-badware-punch
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Axerodata.com&btnG=Google+Search