Re: Tor notice

[Jim <Jimmymac@xxxxxxxxxx>]

andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacemarc@xxxxxxxxx wrote 0.4K bytes in 9 lines about:
> : why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
> : strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
> : anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps.

> Many other tools simply state they are anonymous, without mentioning any
> of the R&D on current anonymity attacks, their success probabilities,
> and design flaws. If you're interested in learning more about the
> current state of the field of anonymity in research, start here;
> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/full/topic.html

Would it make sense to add that link, or some other link, to the message 
  Tor prints out so the casual user can get some idea of what the 
message means?

Jim
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/