[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 23, Issue 2



i think we should hold on the transfers and meanwhile my mom works foor a goood lawfirm. i'll have her access her database of different tech/criminal lawyers and i'll give the OoP sum names and numbers. it will cost some money though....
best regards and wishes,

- Ed


ps.    If the OP whose being seized wants to pay me 40.99 in paypal I'll get him two lawyers to work on his case for free.
meanwhile if u need a lawyer i can get him 2 for the pprice of 1 with a little negotiating with the LLC or INC.... Its the deal of a lifetime. I can even send u the information before he pays me so i dont scam... And once i do this he can throw mme 41 bucks.
best regards and wishes

- Ed Again
-----Original Message-----
Date: Saturday, December 01, 2012 6:25:01 am
To: tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: tor-talk Digest, Vol 23, Issue 2

Send tor-talk mailing list submissions to
	tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	tor-talk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
	tor-talk-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of tor-talk digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
      help if you can. (Naslund, Steve)
   2. Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
      help if you can. (Naslund, Steve)
   3. tor based website (ElectricSinkHole@xxxxxxxxx)
   4. Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
      help if you can. (Achter Lieber)
   5. Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node.	Please
      help if (Joe Greco)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:37:16 -0600
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <nanog@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit
	node. Please help if you can.
Message-ID:
	<2A76E400AC84B845AAC35AA19F8E7A5D0D71223B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

OK, I get it.  I think my BS detector is set to high today.  I am just
really suspicious that this guy that runs an large ISP can't at least
wait until there are charges before all the uproar.  I think if the cops
came and seized my home PCs right now I would probably give them the
time to look at them, realize there is nothing there, and give them back
to me before freaking out completely.  I would be wondering what was
going on but probably not raising a defense fund.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kristolaitis [mailto:alter3d@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:21 PM
To: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help
if you can.

I didn't say anything about trying to run away.  That probably won't 
accomplish a whole lot in the long run.   But when all of your bank 
accounts and credit cards are frozen, and your house is a crime scene,
at least you have the means to rent a hotel room, contact
family/lawyers, etc.

And no, I'm not OK with people keeping any money that was donated for a
specific purpose in excess of what was actually used.  You'd hope that
he'd be a good guy about it and give back the portion that wasn't used,
or clearly state that any excess will go to charity or something.  
However, there's no such guarantee (short of doing it through a trust
fund with his lawyer), and just like any philanthropic venture, it's up 
to each donor choose when/if they'll help out.   It's just like 
Kickstarter -- you hope to get something good out of it, but if it
bombs, well... you pay your money and you take your chances.

- Pete



On 11/30/2012 05:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I thought 
> there were.  I personally don't have a "runaway kit" stashed away.  I 
> will get right on that. So when that "mouth breather cop" won't 
> believe you are innocent, your answer is to grab your stuff and go on 
> the lamb for awhile?  I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank,

> get your stuff, and leave town.  I think you have seen way to many
movies.
>
> So if the cops show up at his door tomorrow and say "Here's all your 
> stuff back, there was no evidence of a crime.", you are OK with this 
> guys keeping the "defense fund"?
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Kristolaitis [mailto:alter3d@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:53 PM
> To: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please 
> help if you can.
>
>
> On 11/30/2012 04:01 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>>     I am a little concerned that this guy keeps a safe deposit box 
>> with a burner phone and cash around.  Is he a CIA agent? :)
> Anyone who DOESN'T have such things stashed away somewhere is, IMHO, 
> incredibly naive and taking on quite a large amount of risk.
>
> The likelihood (and hope) is that you'll never need it.  But on the 
> off chance that you get f***ed by the legal system because of some 
> power hungry, mouth-breather cop who can't/won't understand that 
> you've done nothing wrong -- or worse, that you're easily provably 
> within the law, but he "believes" that you're not and drags you 
> through the process anyways -- you'll be very happy that you stashed 
> away that old unlocked cell phone, old laptop, change of clothes and
cash.
>
> I'm a (legal) firearms owner... up here in Canada, where some previous

> governments enacted extreme anti-gun legislation, that pretty much 
> means that if I so much as sneeze in a way that a cop doesn't like, I 
> can have my life ruined pretty damned fast (not quite, but really 
> close).  I wouldn't bet against me having an 
> excrement-hitting-the-oscillator stash like this guy does.  ;)
>
> (Note:  I don't mean to imply that all cops are power hungry
> mouth-breathers intent on destroying the lives of citizens.   Most
cops
> are fundamentally good people and do a great job.  But like every 
> other profession, there ARE bad cops out there, and it's within the 
> realm of possibility that you'll deal with one of them one day.)
>
>> Why would I donate to his legal defense when he has not been charged 
>> yet?  A little premature, no?
>>
> If you think that legal costs in a criminal case only start when
you've
> been formally charged, you're grossly misinformed.   At what point you
> personally decide to donate is one thing, but implying that someone 
> doesn't need a defense fund prior to charges being laid is a bit naive

> about how the process works.
>
> - Pete
>
>
>




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:44:50 -0600
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] William was raided for running a Tor exit
	node. Please help if you can.
Message-ID:
	<2A76E400AC84B845AAC35AA19F8E7A5D0D712251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

I might be reading this the wrong way but it looked to me like the cops
raided his home and the Tor server is hosted off site with an ISP.  That
is what is bugging me so much.  The cops raided his house, not the
location of the server.  If they had tracked the server by its IP it
would have led to the hoster, not his home.  They could have gotten his
address as the account holder but the ISP would have known that the Tor
server was at their site not his home.  The IP would not track to his
residence.  Something is not the full story here or I am misreading his
interview.

I have seen some of the warrants due to child porn cases.  They tend to
be very sweeping and usually specify recordable media and data
processing equipment.  That is admittedly broad but the cops usually do
not have forensic computer guys on site so they try to grab it all.  It
is not right but that is how it currently works.  Anything else requires
the expertise on site to search the equipment where it is.  Most cops
don't know a PC from a router, from a switch.  It all goes.


Steven Naslund

-----Original Message-----
From: William Herrin [mailto:bill@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 4:21 PM
To: Jimmy Hess
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help
if you can.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/29/12, William Herrin <bill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If the computer at IP:port:timestamp transmitted child porn, a 
>> warrant for "all computers" is also too broad. "Computers which use 
>> said IP
>
> As you know, there may always be some uncertainty about which computer

> was usi

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk