[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time Warner bad / VPS recommendations
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Time Warner bad / VPS recommendations
- From: John Brooks <special@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:48:48 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:48:52 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SgyFBF+YLLM7V7e1AglxS4fPtNGS4nHCcLil1ARVIvU=; b=p/zAs6MmliTyT+hvi+O2lSWVOjxrd1ZuywKUwkI0I6cWJxcEFGSP60ESzrhnVdGX8T fF0k1ka8hfUH+/TI+DC6hM5hNeFHRXuCsrNQOn6KinSlg1kWz4gv5CsquCIlwK8N9vYP 7O9QfXUjzgxdneAYGGXpo4Ux4zhR7Wp5ZdcE4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=T9ISOgHHA1DXWe9xEn9rLiLyp3lqL0Tm+0CAWofrqytAFXgCFEs7Ts7WUdA1pwAnhw nhwMPdFHpzk50IKFMSN6t3jBuq84RikouOyXb5MJ3WBfJMxJ/lLzZcJVatwNzB5eQuV5 YcuiXbTMBecCATZJyes2NlnU2IOZNyErm7rSI=
- In-reply-to: <4987AEF9.5070905@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4987AEF9.5070905@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Two very important factors to keep in mind for a tor node on a VPS are memory and FD limits. A lot of VPS software will limit the number of sockets available to each guest, which is usually a limit tor will run into quickly. I run my 300 KB/s node with a limit of 8192 sockets, and it usually has 5000-6000 open. Aside from that, a tor node handling a significant amount of traffic will start using ridiculous amounts of memory after running for a couple days; I regularly see mine at 200-300mb. VPS systems are notoriously low on those two resources, so you should keep that in mind while searching.
As for hosts that will allow Tor, the best recommendation I have is to be up-front about it. Explain it and ask explicitly if you will have problems; there is a good chance they'll give a vague answer to get the sale and go back on it later, but still worth a try.
And just because somebody should say it, thanks for being so dedicated to running a node. Tor depends on people like you ;)
- John Brooks
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Matthew McCabe <mateo07@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
So Time Warner Cable finally gave me an ultimatum that either I stop running Tor or they will shut off my service. This was after 3 DMCA and 2 general abuse/hacking complaints. Note that Time Warner does not say anything about proxy servers in their AUP. They were just tired of getting these complaints on my account. Also, AT&T was not able to setup DSL service at my location...so I have decided to kill my Tor exit node.
I would really like to continue running a Tor exit node. I have looked at a couple virtual hosting companies such as vpslink and slicehost. Some of their cheaper plans seem like they would be sufficient for running a Tor exit node. Does anyone run Tor on a VPS? If so, which company and plan do you use? Have you gotten any flack for running a Tor exit node?