[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: tor over ipv6

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tor over ipv6
From: Francis GUDIN <francis.lists.TOR@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:06:50 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:06:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <20090119221345.GA15838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4974CC7D.2070902@xxxxxxxxx> <20090119221345.GA15838@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

Hi,

On Monday, 19 January 2009 at 17:13:45 -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote :
> Hang on!  This is a FAQ!  The state of, and issues surrounding,
> IPv6 in Tor are explained here:
>    https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IPv6

Please excuse my naive question:

wouldn't *requiring a dual-stack OS* (hence excluding those IPv6-only
hosts' hurdles) speed things up ?
I mean: there are a lot more people out there eager to jump on to
IPv6 (either via tunnelling or natively, for the lucky few) than
"next-gen only" operators. Dealing with these /later/ might be
acceptable.

Regards,
-- 
Francis

Prev by Author: Re: Avoiding HTTPS pitfalls [was: Re: Moxie Marlinspike]
Next by Author: Re: Some Bones to Pick with Tor Admins
Previous by thread: Re: failed to choose an exit server
Next by thread: DNSPort and DNSListenAddress and SocksPolicy
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread