On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 17:07 +0100, tagnaq wrote: > https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#KeyManagement > (Coordination section) > > General Design Document: > https://www.torproject.org/docs/documentation.html.en#DesignDoc > https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/design-paper/tor-design.html > (chapter 6.3) > Note: This document is from 2004. Statements like "new nodes must be > approved by the directory server administrator before they are included" > are no longer valid. > > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/HEAD:/doc/spec/dir-spec.txt#l142 Wow! This will keep me busy for quite a while! Thanks! > Well this is currently a 'hot topic' and I refer you to the lengthy > thread 'Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?'. > Short answer: you can not reliably detect passive sniffing. Yes, I'm following 'Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?' but at times it's *very* confusing. Well, I won't worry about exit nodes until I won't have better understanding of Tor and networking in general. -- Tomasz Moskal <ramshackle.industries@xxxxxxxxx> Encrypted mail preferred. Key ID: 2C323C82
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part