[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-talk] Ars Technica on Iran's latest strategy



https://bugs.torproject.org/4927 seems to have been effective.  We
just need to hunt down and fix some obfsproxy (server-side) crash bugs
and get a good list of very-high-bandwidth obfsproxy bridges before we
tell everyone where to find a Tor+obfsproxy client bundle.

On 2012-02-10, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/iran-reportedly-blocking-encrypted-internet-traffic.ars
> I'm not sure what we can do in response to something like this.
> Obviously this is a pretty extreme move with high costs,
> so Iran doesn't have the ability to do anything else, and by making
> the choice shutting down e-commerce or tolerating tor,
> we do a lot. But what countermeasures can we envision against this?
> Sincerely,
> Watson Ladd
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk