[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world
From: "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:29:45 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:29:57 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+m71YgQl5aV+0UTdERJm29Gc880ZBd+YQ8gcYt7RTt4=; b=qahcyEUJr3fEw3h1/GE7u5ipAFfUUdc55Btf8MgpuMX6LEipdpJEtyB9L/2J1v3Muk/3MguXU5E9P5vMZKN1C4PXynSJrDTHId5zamLGyhFjqDWNJVHuF18kyPq5yq0o6C5kAOLXakCdd213UBDNZE22l+Ff0wdF56WLcXgNL8E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jMXA8+XwtzKTdkd5tR7NP9OvxZwV1J0DRmxgRLRWPzmOwu3s/cb3IisplDkLYaheGf1YjJ8tny+tcyXiYNefBV0/1cxPaUNQXJbTD+Tbv25sPZ5pD8qfRlBeeRl+oiRmcBPlF5Z1b/3JF+UC7ahd47Ja8jmv9WTCCacjV+TavRY=
In-reply-to: <4782B4AF.2010409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3922422b0801051518gd019da8nfbeeac8fe7539c13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4e79549a0801051614j31c035cfq9c137b6bd75ecbae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3922422b0801051616s5820b871k3a78cf75df0e55d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200801071445.49864.xiando@xxxxxxxxxx> <4782384E.5040705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20080107214015.GH5566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4782B4AF.2010409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
(snip)
| I changed the ExitPolicity of my node and it was delisted half a year
|  ago. The ports 465 and 587 were open since Dez. 2007 and SORBS did
| not list my server again.

So it *is* selective, and not carte blanche?

Encrypted and authenticated SMTP (as used on Google, through port 587)
are an example of a *good* way to use email through Tor. :-)

I just hope they don't start requiring widgets to sign up...

- --
F. Fox: A+, Network+, Security+
Owner of Tor node "kitsune"
http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHguAZbgkxCAzYBCMRCMxWAJ4obyJ8nnTUWGr0bZQZ62PE+CE1KwCfX63X
R1hG2p94o/uBIMlNPqss/dE=
=3i3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- List Suggestion
  - From: Ringo Kamens
- Re: List Suggestion
  - From: KT
- Re: List Suggestion
  - From: Ringo Kamens
- Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world (was: List Suggestion)
  - From: xiando
- Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world
  - From: Michael Holstein
- Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world
  - From: TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1)

Prev by Author: Re: What to do at IP number change?
Next by Author: Re: Restrict relay to internet2
Previous by thread: Re: SORBS vs Tor and the world
Next by thread: RE: List Suggestion
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread