[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: What to do at IP number change?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: What to do at IP number change?
- From: "anon ymous" <a.y.main.contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:26:11 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:26:21 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wBVt5A6swameGo8Ov08/bJrb8LSWESzCVI6FgB7rzc0=; b=HMFDSbIV3NxHrvu6V+R/4eawbF+tRANkbMQuRd+zkdC8xSRXP4rQ+rNek72ytCoF2hJ3YGSKmqfBLMaV1qTx8vMqovwIgfBq0bHezO1DgeGLLOTQEeL3Sr/4KLC6IB6P11HBefSlJAmH+2fR89Q4hZk5/ea9XGhZiwESbYyho6k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q0SR7Tx9Q658QERfLMGZQYVdO70ay1bK9T4zRrSW6hdt/5TJEfRIrACsVVlJAIL0mCz9LrEtdSDZJLaKri3CPsjOFVnY+vT+3P6R2HXIvmB3wb6Q2BtP9Z0RcSOQCj5nXJcHnoHYnZggfSX75fIldk+S8bripXUX6fGLBLIGNxA=
- In-reply-to: <200801100524.m0A5OQrW002342@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200801100524.m0A5OQrW002342@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If a middleman dies and the client gets to know this.
Can a running circuit be recovered by chosing a new middle-man and
informing the nodes down the chain about this?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org
iD8DBQFHheR/LAZ+Vq4hPgARAgbBAKDApQRjRSZHpxwIFsPSoOZrTUI7BACePshR
EYT6Kc9IgUemN2K4g/YJqJg=
=g2EE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 1/10/08, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:31:02 -0800 "F. Fox" <kitsune.or@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >Roger Dingledine wrote:
> >(snip)
> >| Even if you hup your Tor rather than restarting it, you're still killing
> >| all the circuits going through you...
> >(snip)
> >
> >I didn't know this; since I'm using Kitsune-OR experimentally in part,
> >I've SIGHUP'ed it quite often after tweaking it. I thought that SIGHUP
> >didn't harm circuits like a restart obviously would, but I guess I was
> >wrong.
>
> You're missing the point w.r.t. killing circuits. The SIGHUP to tor
> has nothing to do with the circuits dying. The circuits die because you
> removed the IP address at your end of the TCP connections conducting those
> circuits from the Internet. It's the same as though your entire system had
> crashed. It does it to every other open TCP connection on your system
> routed
> through the now defunct IP address at the same time, not just to tor's TCP
> connections.
> >
> >I'll need to keep this in mind - thank you, Roger. =:o)
> >
> Roger's other comments regarding the directory operations are things
> you should gather from the documentation, too. Perhaps it would be worth
> your time to (re)read the basic documentation and also the document covering
> each of the directory protocol versions.
>
>
> Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army." *
> * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
> **********************************************************************
>