[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

HidServDirectoryV2 option

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: HidServDirectoryV2 option
From: Olaf Selke <olaf.selke@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:14:18 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:14:11 -0500
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

hi,

recently I was told about the HidServDirectoryV2 server option. So far only fournodes accept and serve v2 hidden service descriptors:

=> gpfTOR1, gpfTOR3, gabelmoo, and my own node blutmagie

Are there any known drawbacks with HidServDirectoryV2?

Olaf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: HidServDirectoryV2 option
  - From: Karsten Loesing

Prev by Author: Re: suspicions Chinese node name piracy
Next by Author: compile issue on Solaris with tor-0.2.0.16-alpha and tor-0.2.0.17-alpha
Previous by thread: Re: directory authority/authorities need(s) updating?
Next by thread: Re: HidServDirectoryV2 option
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread