[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: directory authority/authorities need(s) updating?
Scott Bennett schrieb:
Mhmm. I think, 16-alpha missed a file in the release and 17-alpha had a huge
memory leak, I think, it is sane no to recommend them.
18-alpha is different, but it is quite new, I would not be surprised if it is
recommended not until a few days in the wild, but I don't know the policy
The latest consensus file appears to have 0.2.0.18-alpha listed as
a recommended server version, but not 0.2.0.16-alpha or 0.2.0.17-alpha,
even though it still lists 0.2.0.11-alpha, 0.2.0.12-alpha, and
0.2.0.15-alpha. Also, the individual status documents are still in
considerable disagreement with each other. Are the directory authority
operators getting careless?