[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?
- From: Jon <torance.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:13:13 -0600
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:13:22 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eCJzP9l+wQ5zY8o2NfKat68fYER46HTtLdBcolJNaNo=; b=RA9BkJqo153of6/3A34t+MIDykkjjO5cDNL5IccvZ5gmk0lQ3LbcwAvhEwNt8DP55D kBDXSHP8edHw67jhY0G9jVqru9wAlRlomv+aKONNSzzf/mhViFLRPxD//yOKQiE7o5zi 5sLsjoK3GO2IYNGPiaLLKvrijZH7f16YqLa9U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YOIS2OCW4P7ZbPOZcEXxF7/qUPfKvW5QQH+nz97pFE0BNqmXwLdyZ+QoPtejP0VKMG V9POqrio7DTX0iT27JNvj2Br08U7I7FFCa0fkmfaeNaHRCp6fBD7+g9FrTVVTHNEBez+ xgo2qYNA9SWNztEZw9YAaGTPmc0sSuDpupLLw=
- In-reply-to: <4D44607C.6030900@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <4D44607C.6030900@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jan Weiher <jan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while scrolling through the tor status page (torstatus.blutmagie.de), I
> stumpled upon the following node (the reason why it came to my eye was
> the long uptime):
>
> gatereloaded 550C C972 4FA7 7C7F 9260 B939 89D2 2A70 654D 3B92
>
> This node looks suspicious to me, because there is no contact info given
> and the exit policy allows only unencrypted traffic:
>
> reject 0.0.0.0/8:*
> reject 169.254.0.0/16:*
> reject 127.0.0.0/8:*
> reject 192.168.0.0/16:*
> reject 10.0.0.0/8:*
> reject 172.16.0.0/12:*
> reject 194.154.227.109:*
> accept *:21
> accept *:80
> accept *:110
> accept *:143
> reject *:*
>
> Am I missing something? I'm wondering why the status page lists this
> node as non-exit, because it clearly allows outgoing traffic on ports
> 21,80,110 and 143?
> I'm aware of the fact that it is not recommended to use tor without
> additional encryption, but some users do. And I dont see any reason for
> only allowing unencrypted traffic than snooping?
> Can anyone clearify this? If the admin of this node is on the list,
> would he please explain this situation?
>
> best regards,
> Jan
It may possible be a middle node instead of an exit node.
As for lack of contact info, can't answer that. I know there have
been several other nodes in past without a contact info.
Jon
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/