>> In short, TorBirdy is the shit! > Why torbirdy is shit? There’s a difference [1], he’s saying it’s great and you should be fine using it. [1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+shit On 27 Jan 2015, at 09:01, Formidable <formidable@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why torbirdy is shit? > Only because it leave in header system's timezone? > > spencerone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: >> Cypher cypher at cpunk.us: >>>> A few months ago, I seem to remember the general advice being not to >>>> use Torbirdy. But I see the software was updated only a few months ago >>>> so I assume it's in active development. Can I assume Torbirdy is safe >>>> to use? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Cypher >>>> >> Jacob Appelbaum jacob at appelbaum.net: >>> Using TorBirdy is fine - the two time leaks are very small issues >>> compared to using Thunderbird without TorBirdy. This is especially so >>> for weak crypto, or a total lack of crypto, which may be possible >>> without TorBirdy. >>> >>> It isn't perfect but it is a whole lot better than plain old >>> SMTP/POP/IMAP, HTML email, etc, etc. >>> >>> Remember we're comparing Thunderbird without TorBirdy vs with >>> TorBirdy: it is strictly better, even if imperfect. >>> >>> All the best, >>> Jacob >> >> In short, TorBirdy is the shit! >> >> Wordlife, >> SpencerOne >> > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk