[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: IRCNet abuse

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IRCNet abuse
From: "Jonathan D. Proulx" <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:54:54 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:52:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <396556a205060810482e462d8d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <001701c56c48$b2a1a3f0$0a0aa8c0@none> <20050608174239.08B56CC7AA1@mail.poboxes.info> <396556a205060810482e462d8d@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote:

:You could port sniff outbound 6667 ports with tcpdump or ethereal.

that's a bit rude, quite possible though.


I get direct abuse complaints since I'm my own ISP as it were, I don't
know how ISPs filter down or ignore abuse complaints, so don't know
howmany people this applies to.  If you are running on a fixed IP
address with a domain name you control attached to it you'll know.

-Jon

Follow-Ups:
- RE: IRCNet abuse
  - From: Evert Meulie
- Re: IRCNet abuse
  - From: Robert Mischke

References:
- IRCNet abuse
  - From: maillist
- RE: IRCNet abuse
  - From: Evert Meulie
- Re: IRCNet abuse
  - From: Adam Langley

Prev by Author: Re: evil nodes
Next by Author: Re: IRCNet abuse
Previous by thread: Re: IRCNet abuse
Next by thread: RE: IRCNet abuse
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread