[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCTP
- To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: SCTP
- From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:11:44 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:19:37 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VtvQsp/+8afeSeWQwBvRw4kRf3iorfLCTJmgpq7IPdI=; b=Lwp4MeszBG29tfxmdkONF1IF8gEyyUXS/kQilRcNrA9UwgXevwYU/NgeksDmd+eQ4W bMU5xNbbEdlcuPLH0M+Co2EKuE5mEC1tRHVYHcbimRywLkTLoC/jynfghs0Fu6kzsY3h 1X2GyNrGMXvotWa2Lut3PP2C02iT5DzrnK/BI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rOmyvDbCW1OB67iBMAwLtsWQiO4CjKXLE4WrwD4KJiT6lE0W7J2/UFnqRzzEyZdg+W f/nsFPod+prsYmdssZbb/AQ8MlaQqn2q8a5pYaJDxyFfvEZFkU4C6HNZVv1jihp4ESp4 q7Z+/v73WKfej16xYzjwdQ/DruonjhhrcWdOQ=
- In-reply-to: <200906031407.n53E7nDS021083@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <200906031407.n53E7nDS021083@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This may seem to some like beating a dead horse, but SCTP really is
> coming to the Internet. It just looks too useful to die like OSI did. The
> more I find out about it, the more it looks like a really good match for
> tor. In fact, it looks like it might be something from a network-
> application-developer heaven. It has been available in FreeBSD since
> 7.0-RELEASE and was officially announced as being a fully supported part
> of FreeBSD when 7.2-RELEASE was made available about a month ago. More
> features will be supported in 8.0-RELEASE whenever that comes out, too.
> There must be similar progress in LINUX kernel development, but I
> don't follow that very much, so I'd be grateful if a few of the LINUX users
> on this list were to describe the current support status of SCTP in the
> various distributions of LINUX. Sooner or later, even Micro$lop will have
> to release it for its miserable excuses for operating systems, too.
[snip]
SCTP works fine in Linux. Has been there since around the kernel 2.5 days.