[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: "cracks" via tor

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: "cracks" via tor
From: Eugene Armstead <eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:56:05 -0700
Authentication-results: samson.armsteadent.com; sender-id=pass; spf=pass
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:56:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <4225ABE6.4010400@ostengaard.dk>
Organization: Armstead Enterprise
References: <200503011503.51068.moe@blagblagblag.org> <4225ABE6.4010400@ostengaard.dk>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8+ (Windows/20041101)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simon Østengaard wrote:
| I have discussed this issue with one of the leading IT lawyers in
| Denmark. He said that according to the danish law (and most European
| laws) the only legal issue you could face by running a tor server is if
| the law require you to log which traffic you pass trough the server.
| There is such a law in Denmark but it only affects companies, not
| private persons or organisations.

What about American TOR operators?

- --
Eugene Armstead, Jr.
Armstead Enterprise
W:  www.armsteadent.com
E:  eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: My public key http://www.armsteadent.com/publickey.txt

iD8DBQFCJeIVIN2QP2Hx3YwRAhVbAJ0YWxsXsVKf8Z39h8vaH3ijxR0OPgCggLaL
F+6o+FdCOrQAQcnvEI3A7SQ=
=ze7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "cracks" via tor
  - From: Simon Østengaard

References:
- "cracks" via tor
  - From: jeff
- Re: "cracks" via tor
  - From: Simon Østengaard

Prev by Author: Tor 0.1.0.1-rc - Problems with included torrc
Next by Author: Re: What good is tor for webbrowsing, if your ip address is not hidden
Previous by thread: Re: "cracks" via tor
Next by thread: Re: "cracks" via tor
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread