[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: v0.1.1.12 vs v0.1.1.14a

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: v0.1.1.12 vs v0.1.1.14a
From: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:19:00 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:19:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <1141838150.9968.256137567@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1141838150.9968.256137567@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626)

FWIW, I see better stability and memory use on .14a (FreeBSD 5.4).

~Mike.

nosnoops@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Tor v0.1.1.12 vs Tor v0.1.1.14a Who wins the fight in any aspect of it? Security? Functionality? What ever?

References:
- v0.1.1.12 vs v0.1.1.14a
  - From: nosnoops

Prev by Author: Re: insert mail
Next by Author: Re: Firefox extension: TorButton
Previous by thread: v0.1.1.12 vs v0.1.1.14a
Next by thread: Re: v0.1.1.12 vs v0.1.1.14a
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread