Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +
From: User 165 <user165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:42:51 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:42:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <71cd4dd90605151737h1b52a81cg1768d3f2e00dfc42@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1147732045.crackedactor@supanet.com> <4469028B.8010208@pavlovian.net> <71cd4dd90605151737h1b52a81cg1768d3f2e00dfc42@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On May 15, 2006, at 5:37 PM, Anthony DiPierro wrote:


Remember that by default Tor *does* censor.  Port 25 is blocked by
default.  Why is this?

I don't think that deciding which ports to allow has anything to do with censorship. Censorship refers to content, not method.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +
  - From: glymr

References:
- Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +
  - From: crackedactor
- Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +
  - From: Ben Wilhelm
- Re: Some legal trouble with TOR in France +
  - From: Anthony DiPierro