Re: [tor-talk] tor/netfilter: packets without uid

[Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/11/2012 07:43 PM, coderman wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Marsh Ray <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ...
>>> How is it possible for a packet not to have an associated uid?
>> ...
>> I'm not a netfilter expert, but it looks this is a pure TCP ACK packet. With
>> LEN=40 there's no application data in it. It may have been auto-generated by
>> the kernel as a reply to the external packet and never tagged with a user
>> for that reason.
> 
> if the application closes a socket there are time wait states that
> retain the socket ip:port endpoint in kernel land without an
> associated application user ID.
> 
> try disabling time wait to confirm. if it is indeed sockets locally
> closed but still receiving (and ACK'ing) you may get a little extra
> bandwidth dropping them (remote re-sends until timeout) but it
> shouldn't affect functionality.

If this is actually the case, I'd say that this is a kernel bug. :(

The best bet is probably to ensure that _all_ packets, regardless of UID
are sent over Tor and only specific UID's are _excepted_ from the policy.

All the best,
Jacob

_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk