Anders Andersson: > A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new top-level > domain names. A friend recently posted a .onion link to me, and it made me > realize that there might be a big problem if a company or organization > other than Tor actually registered .onion and made it work in any browser. > > 1) Has there been any discussions regarding the severity of the problem if > it should eventually happen? If so, are the discussions or the result of > them available online for reading? > > 2) Has Tor applied to ICANN about the .onion domain, or discussed the pro > and con of doing this? https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2013-November/005747.html The document actually expired yesterday: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-02 The last call for review on DNSOP has seen no reaction: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg11364.html I am not familiar enough of IETF processes to know what that means. -- Lunar <lunar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk