Re[2]: Marketing Tor (Was Re: For those using Tor with windows)

[Arrakistor <arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Eugen,

I  really,  really  like  this  idea.  We  could  have anon users with
anon-tokens,  linked  up to disposable margined accounts, like calling
cards.  I  think we would need access to internet services much closer
to backbones than the ISP->client range if we were trying to guarantee
a level of throughput/latency.

ST

Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 9:40:03 AM, you wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:19:23PM +0100, Christian Siefkes wrote:

>> What would be the purpose of running Tor in a private single-owner network?

> Being able to buy a speedy, reliable service? (Besides, with peering it
> could be a private multi-owner network mosaic, only with guaranteed throughput).

>> The network owner knows who you are and what you do, so unless you know you
>> can trust them _and_ they won't surrender to legal or hacker attacks you're

> If there are no logs there is nothing to surrender. As to hackers, systems
> can be sufficiently hardened and monitored.

>> out of luck.
>> 
>> You can just skip the Tor part and use a private SSH tunnel such as
>> Privacy.li, that'll give you the same amount of security.

> I don't know the people behind privacy.li. Are these the usual suspects?
> Static SSH tunnels are somewhat of a sitting duck, too. Tor is more dynamic.




-- 
Best regards,
 Arrakistor                            mailto:arrakistor@xxxxxxxxx