[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: POST not anonymous?

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: POST not anonymous?
From: Merijn Vogel <merijn.vogel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:25:09 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:25:16 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=F1OzGDdfimqZuyAYprjiwcXpXTNCftUMiDbNzmm4NVTztUriUgKQFCWz6EF6/s+iFSX/Ta2Q5IbHuFYVzdhPle1XjQoYDgsh4oBErXFSeqMEZDSH4Vs10/Xkpyl6wkd9DjFSxbwJXwYSgI5Hrou1xD2VwZNg/AbN2cYUZRUqXd4=
In-reply-to: <20051122160754.GF18096@csail.mit.edu>
References: <39a51d0b0511220756j4e71c5d7j4da0ccb640aa2b7c@mail.gmail.com> <20051122160754.GF18096@csail.mit.edu>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Or it may have been my proxy settings, I guess the pitfall is a default squid setting to let POST requests to cgi-bin like things be handled directly rather than via the other cache, being privoxy. For being anonymous in POSTing I should use privoxy directly, and not using squid.

- Merijn

On 11/22/05, Jonathan D. Proulx <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Probably java or _javascript_. They can pick all sorts of info off your
system and send it through the connection.

-Jon

References:
- POST not anonymous?
  - From: Merijn Vogel
- Re: POST not anonymous?
  - From: Jonathan D. Proulx

Prev by Author: POST not anonymous?
Next by Author: DNS block in place at 151.8.40.35 (molly)
Previous by thread: Re: POST not anonymous?
Next by thread: Busy DNS Workers warning
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread